I’ll admit, I was immediately swept away by the film and immediately 100% for the cause. And I still am. As far as the organization goes, Invisible Children, I’m still doing research on them. But, from what I’ve seen so far, I don’t see any glaring reason to believe they’re not a legitimate organization. And the problems that I do see, they’ve addressed them pretty well.
So if you haven’t done your research (especially if you’re one of those people that’re spouting off at the mouth about this) then you should get started.
Now, to respond to some of the general criticisms I’ve seen floating around the internet:
“Just because you watched a video you’re an activist now?”
Easily the most ridiculous criticism I’ve seen. My immediate reaction to this is: would you rather people remain in the dark, living their blissfully ignorant first-world lives? Why is it such a problem that people are getting excited about making a difference? Think about it. Did Martin Luther King pop out of the womb as an activist? Was Mother Theresa born a saint? No, so just stop. People have to become aware of the issues in order to begin addressing them. And even if the vast majority of people will never lead a movement or become a saint, they can still make a difference, however small. (Corny, but’s true.)
“They’re blowing this out of proportion. The LRA hasn’t been active in Uganda for years and they’ve killed less people recently in the countries they’ve been active in.”
Oh yeah, it’s no big deal. Thousands of children abducted? Thousands more killed? Hundreds of thousands of people dislocated? Eh, no biggie. Really? What about the thousands of people who have been affected? And even if Ugandans are concerned with other issues at present, I don’t see why they wouldn’t want to see the man who’d ravaged their homeland for years prior walk away scotch-free. Where’s the justice in that? I agree with IC 100% in saying that if Kony is captured and put on trial, that sends a huge message to everyone else on ICC’s list.
“What about *insert some other social issue that this person thinks is more important, most likely because it primarily affects the U.S. here*? What are we doing about that, huh? Isn’t that more important right now?”
Here’s an idea: Why don’t you do something about that? Why don’t you start a movement and get people to care about that cause? Why don’t you make a documentary that will get 50 million views in two days?
This is one cause in a sea of worthwhile causes; I acknowledge that. The U.S. has it’s own problems; I’m all too aware of that. But think about this: if this guy was in America would he be able to get away with it? No, he’d be on the government’s hit list so quickly he wouldn’t be able to blink before they had him in handcuffs. So just because the Ugandan and other African governments are corrupt and commit many similar abuses, does that mean we should allow more citizens to be affected? Are their lives worth less than ours? Just some food for thought.
“Awareness is great and everything, but what’s that gonna do in the long run?”
It has the power to prompt people to act. I agree, sitting around posting statuses and “changing your profile picture” (as one blog so pompously phrased it) is not going to affect real change. But you know what you CAN do now that you’re AWARE of the issue? Write to your congressman; write to any of the policymakers on IC’s list; write to any authority figure you think could have some real sway. And btw, President Obama AND most of Congress is already signed onto this. Half the battle is already won.
I haven’t done this and I realize that I’m being hypocritical by sitting here writing this blog post when I could be writing to Congress. But I’ll get on it soon.
This is just some indie, hipster film that’s really about the filmmakers and getting them famous. They’re trying to make westerners feel like they can go in and help out the “downtrodden” Africans.
IC’s approach is what people are criticizing above anything else If IC’s cause had been something they’re deeming “important” now, they’d be saying it was irrelevant and misguided and whatever else, just because IC would approach it similarly. But my thinking is this: you’re still talking about it. You’re hating, but you’re still talking. So who’s really winning, either way? Besides that, WHY are you hating?! Yeah, it’s kinda “hipster.” Yeah, it’s definitely “indie.” And yeah, it might even make those who get involved feel - God forbid - empowered about themselves. None of that matters. This film has managed to do what no other documentary of this kind has been able to do in recent years - it’s reaching people. And it’s reached A LOT of people, and fast.
If anything, you have to admit that a documentary that’s gotten over 50 million views is powerful. Call it propaganda. Maybe. Call it simplified. Fine. Call it misleading. Perhaps. But I’ll go back to my previous point: you’re still calling it something.
—-
Also, if you’re still reading this, read THIS. It’s a blog post written by an indie (oh no, I’ve used that dirty word again) recording artist named Nikki Lynette, responding to all the major criticisms out there. It’s incredibly well written and accurate. She did her research, so I commend her from that viewpoint, especially.
So there’s my rant on KONY 2012. Feel free to hit up my ask box (or just reply to this post) if you agree, disagree, have an interesting source to share, or just wanna comment.
- Ace.